SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GZMO

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (126)10/18/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) of 438
 
relevant background info......

Surgery 1999 Aug;126(2):112-20

Immune selection after antigen-specific immunotherapy of melanoma.

Riker A, Cormier J, Panelli M, Kammula U, Wang E, Abati A, Fetsch P, Lee KH, Steinberg S, Rosenberg S,
Marincola F

Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. 20892, USA.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma antigen (MA)-specific vaccination strongly enhances antitumor reactivity in vivo and is capable
of producing strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in vitro. Furthermore, specific human leukocyte antigen-restricted T cell
activation is hypothesized to occur in response to peptide-based immunotherapy, which may lead to the preferential killing of
tumor cells bearing the relevant MA. The development of melanoma antigen-loss variants may subsequently occur in vivo.
METHODS: Analysis of 532 melanoma lesions from 204 patients was performed on fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens.
Lesions were graded for the expression of the MAs gp100 and MART-1 with use of immunocytochemistry. A total of 351
melanoma lesions were divided into cohorts on the basis of the treatment received. The pretreatment group (n = 175) consisted
of lesions obtained before any form of gp100 immunotherapy, with the posttreatment group (n = 176) consisting of lesions
obtained after vaccination with a modified gp100 epitope, gp209-2M +/- interleukin 2 (IL-2). RESULTS: The percentage of
lesions not expressing the gp100 antigen is greater than the percentage not expressing MART-1 (26% vs 14%). The frequency
of lesions with high expression (> 75%) of gp100 significantly decreased with therapy (47% vs 34%) and conversely negative
lesions increased (18% vs 29%). Treatment of lesions with peptide alone (no IL-2) revealed a significant decrease in gp100
expression (47% vs 32%), enhanced with the addition of IL-2 to therapy (47% vs 35%). The expression of MART-1
remained essentially unchanged unless IL-2 was added (54% vs 54%, MART-1 peptide alone, 54% vs 43%, MART-1
peptide + IL-2). Of 94 patients (181 lesions) assessed for gp100 expression before treatment, 10 patients responded to
therapy. Pretreatment lesions in responding patients expressed some level of gp100 in all cases compared with 27% of
nonresponding lesions, which were negative for gp100 expression. CONCLUSIONS. This study indirectly demonstrates that
vaccination with an MA-derived peptide can result in immune selection in vivo. Furthermore, it provides strong immunologic
evidence for the specificity of MA vaccines and to the relevance of MA expression in predicting the response to vaccination.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext