SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_biscuit who wrote (8540)10/19/1999 2:42:00 PM
From: Shivram Hala  Read Replies (3) of 12475
 
> You are completely devoid of any grey matter if you think

That's better than being devoid of any matter which fits your profile and "dipyology - the art of walking with your feet in your mouth and head up in your arse" perfectly.

> that there is no difference between merely taking
> possession of missiles and being able to actually
> deploy them in the field.

It was you who made the claim to Sandeep Cariapa
----------------
Friday, Oct 15 1999 12:37PM ET
Reply # 8470
Well, consider these -- Chinese technology transfers to Islamabad were restricted to short-range ballistic missiles.
Even those missiles that were transferred were never allowed to be uncrated. Furthermore, persistent US pressure
had put an end to Chinese inputs into Pakistan's nuclear weapons complex. And China also declined to extend a
nuclear umbrella to Pakistan.
----------------
To which sandeep put it correctly
"Actually the burden of proof is upto you: I'm not the one
making this ABSURED CLAIM of unopened missile crates,
you are. You know when I buy a new car, I don't just
leave it sitting in my garage, I drive it around."
-----------------
Sandep was nice enough of to remind you it was an absurd claim, which is because sandeep doesn't know what kind of "fact" based theories you propounded. Then again he probably knew about you and was gently condescending. To which you tried to obfuscate the issue, but remember this, when you try to walk with your feet in your mouth, you always fall on your face, which for you should be, fall on your arse.

The statement "Even those missiles that were transferred were never allowed to be uncrated." was the most hilarious and ranks right along with the statements from your INTURNASHUUUNULL PHUND MANAGER. But hey, since you seem to have the ear to the what's going on in pakiland land, maybe you're right. They probably haven't opened the crates. Pray tell us O' great seer, how did the chinese manage to achieve the incredible feat of selling M11 missiles to the pakis and at the same time not allow the pakis to open it. That really beats me. Maybe the chinese convinced the pakis that the crate were to be used as coffee tables.

News Release: China convinces pakis to buy millions of $ worth of M11 missiles but do not allow pakis to uncrate them.

News Release: China convinces pakis to buy millions of $ worth of M11 missiles, ships crates and indicate missiles will be shipped later.

News Release: China convinces pakis to buy millions of $ worth of M11 missiles, ships crates and do not allow pakis to uncrate them. The GridLock Times believes that china may have stiffed the pakis by shipping the crates with Uzbek dung. Chinese authories have convinced the pakis to open the crates only when the need arises. Unnamed sources revealed that some pakis commanders have peeked into teh crtaes but have kept quiet because they expect a shipment of No-Dong crates with No No-dongs. The commanders believe that those crates will make better coffee tables than the M11 crates.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext