SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB)
SLUP 0.000010000.0%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cec who wrote ()10/20/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: junglejims  Read Replies (2) of 3679
 
I phoned the office of the sec today and spoke to a representative who I think is a lawyer himself and he basically told me that investigations of this sort can take years to complete and my response was that are we not entitled to a fair and due process, which he countered(this is.)

I asked him to comment on the lawyer handling the case and if anyone was checking it out to see if in fact she has a conflict of interest in the case with SLUP, and his comment was why don't you phone her and ask her and see if she will tell you. To think that the SEC can be arrogant about an issue that affects hundreds of shareholders that have done nothing wrong except to invest in a company that looks promising with a great new product.

He also made a comment to me regarding this thread and he or someone in that office is obviously monitOring this thread because he made reference to hawkeye's postings.

I urge ALL SHAREHOLDERS TO WRITE OR PHONE THE SEC UNTILL WE GET A CONCLUSION TO THIS SITUATION.

If you are a shareholder also post on this thread because they are listening and they usually only listen when the majority of people want answers, this will not get settled by a few individuals speaking up, we need a chorus of investors demanding an ending to this situation and a FAIR AND IMPARTIAL PROCEEDING

KEVIN
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext