SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom C who wrote (4536)10/20/1999 7:14:00 PM
From: Q.  Read Replies (2) of 7056
 
No, I'm sure that the middle two digits in this case do not correspond to the year of birth.

Here's how I know:

using www.ancestry.com, I checked 16 social security numbers that were consecutive (in the last 4 digits) with Reed's. These numbers all had the same first 7 digits, including the same two middle digits. For the 9 people who were already dead, the birthdate is shown in the online records. All 9 of the deceased had a different birth year. Yet they had the same two middle digits.

So Janice, it looks like you had a coinkydink.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News