LURKERS' CORNER:
Lurkers write to pal@pacbell.net
____________________________________________________________________
I just want to clarify my statement about Mr. Sheppard's credibility. I
have held 40,000 shares of FNTN for over 2 years and am in a position of
great loss if I were to sell now. I am LONG. I am very concerned now
though, not so much about the low share price, but about the inability on
my part to be able to put any trust in MS's statements. How do we get the
TRUTH about ongoing processes? His track record is atrocious. I am hanging
in here, but would be happy to see someone at the helm who would give us
the TRUTH warts and all.
I am a man of faith. But faith is only as good as the OBJECT of that
faith. So too, a company is measured in the long run by the honesty and
integrity of those in a position of leadership. I sincerely hope that I am
wrong about our FNTN leadership. But so far the evidence to refute my
conclusion is not evident. Regards, Tom B
---------------------------------------------------------------------
top 10 list
In response to an email from MS which accused me of
being negative.
My suggestion is to give the company a face lift;
1. Maybe even a merger rather than aquisition with a
LD carrier
2. Change of stock symbol, to go with the new
reporting status
3. New company name
4. IR department, a real one, we can call and ask
questions to.
5. New openess and honesty with shareholders, with
an attempt to paint it more like it is
rather than what
management hopes it to be.
6. How about some chats on the chat site on FNTN
7. A webcast featuring our spokesperson in the very
near future
8. Real live advertising. Start small with the free
stuff like linkexchange, anything is better than
nothing.
9. Shareholders meeting, planned well in advance
10. Press releases regarding any positive
developments even if they are small
This email is in response to Michael Sheppard's
requesting suggestions rather than criticism and
negativitiy.
--------------------------------------------------------
In response to
JW@KSC
The quiet period is over. News is news. Companies
release PR's when news exists, stale news isn't worth
releasing. GET IT RIGHT! Lets not confuse the issue.
If the pr's exist lets have them, and have them now.
I suspect they don't exist or aren't worth repeating.
Alls we have with regards to contracts is a single pr
about a letter of intent.
=====
|
