SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: WTC who wrote (5635)10/21/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
"My point is that when those agreements traverse corporate entities, they can create some regulatory friction that can be expensive."

WTC,
I fully agree. I expect, once it sinks in that Pronto is for real, that SBC is going to start catching hell from all perceived competitors that will try to get the government involved in slowing down their plans. A lot like the whirlywind of activity that started when AT&T fired the first broadband cable shot.

But as in the AT&T case, the FCC appears to be pushing SBC to do exactly what Pronto is supposed to do. So maybe it'll be a case of local roadblocks being thrown up as in the AT&T case?

I just don't know what is going to happen, but I do know it won't go smoothly. But those may present buying opps <G> for investors.
MikeM(From Florida)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News