SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (69465)10/22/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (3) of 97611
 
Moe from the ZOO

COMPAQ PROFITS not Sales Growth
by: sikorskys76 103130 of 103160
Compaq computers earnings release on Tuesday, October 26, 1999 will be a pivotal moment in the company's history. It marks the second turnaround in this company's otherwise illustrious record.

Dan Niles, a promininent BankBoston research analyst, calls for fair (not great) news from Compaq. (See: cnetinvestor.com )

Niles is probably the hottest analyst there is in the technology sector. He earlier this year remarked that he saw problems at INTEL, DELL, and IBM -- all of which later where confirmed to be true by the companies. Niles, based in San Francisco, has a remarkable level of access to industry insiders.

What is remarkable about this, however, is that he has nobody inside Compaq who he can tap for inside information -- as has been the case with the other companies. This can be explained by the dismissal of ALL of top management last quarter -- replaced with new recruits who are disinclined to talk their hand versus laying their cars out on the table come the earnings report.

Although Compaq isn't expected to have great growth rates, but fair growth rates, the emphasis of next Tuesday's earnings release will be on PROFITABILITY not sales growth. Compaq maintains quarterly sales of $9-10 BILLION, second only to IBM with quarterly sales of $20 BILLION.

IBM disappointed analyst, in part, because earlier this year they boasted to being able to grow @ 15%, when in the most recent release, their hardware sales grew @ 5%, and are forecast to decline next TWO quarters. Nonetheless, IBM had profits of 90 CENTS, and in 4Q1999 are forecast to have profits of $1 per share. Compaq is forecast to have profits of 5 CENTS a share. With $9 BILLION in quarterly sales Compaq should have greater profitability.

Just as AT&T axed tens of thousands of jobs, boosting profits in excess of 15%, while having a modest 6% sales growth, Compaq should be able to boost profits by sharply cutting costs -- resulting in improved margins. Compaq @ 2% of $9 BILLION in sales, should be able to earn $180 MILLION or 10 CENTS per share in earnings -- double the expected profitability forecast for 3Q1999 of 5 CENTS a share.

Consequently, although Dan Niles is right NOT to EXPECT high sales growth rates from Compaq next week, where he is incorrect is in his focus on growth rates versus profitability.

Absent CONTRACTING or DECLINING sales, Compaq's problems haven't been in being the lowest cost MANUFACTURER -- but rather -- with regard to expenses associated with depreciating values for INVENTORY which they were stuck with when their distributers were unable to sell them into the marketplace. Their deals with their distributors called for a price protection which allowed the distributors to return unsold computer hardware to Compaq or receive payment for the difference in value between what they paid Compaq and the sales markdowns required to move slow selling inventory off their shelves.

The distribution channel now stands @ 4 -- from 46. AND, the new deals Compaq has with their distributors puts the risk of selling all their inventory squarely on the shoulders of the distributors and NOT Compaq -- a recipe for guarenteed profits.

Profitability at Compaq is more than CERTAIN -- it's a guarentee. With a 12,000 reduction in head count -- INCLUDING the dismissal of ALL the executives responsible for this year's profit warning BOMBS, from Eckhard Pfeiffer (at ground zero) to the VP of Human Resources (the bomb radius), Compaq no longer will be paying for an executive team who in the case of Pfeiffer is walking away with $300 million in severance pay and stock, were VERY HIGHLY paid yet produced mediocre results. Their departure alone will cut Compaq's costs in excess of $50 MILLION per year.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext