Actually, afrayem said more than "at Comdex." He said "in Comdex."
<<In mid-November they should have a representative in the Comdex show in Las Vegas.>>
Then again, maybe he was saying less. Is more less or less more? If more is less, then maybe I now understand the CDDD press release.
Was that the real answer afrayem? Did CDDD chose its words as carefully as you have? Was the choice of words intentional or merely reckless or negligent? Did you not know what you were talking about when you posted the foregoing? Did someone at CDDD give you the information that you posted? If they did, don't you think that you owe everyone (and especially anyone long this stock) some disclosure as to who it was?
Another interpretation of afrayem's post has just occurred to me. Maybe by saying "should" he did not mean that they were going to be in Comdex, but rather, just that in his opinion they "should" do so because it would be a good idea. If this is what he meant, which I doubt, it would seem that afrayem has now placed himself in the position of pointing out just how little CDDD is doing to promote its miracle product (or at least they are not doing what he thinks they should be doing). Was that your intention afrayem?
A simple question: Was the information that you posted truthful? If you want to have anyone ever believe that anything you post has any credibility, then you really ought to answer this and explain yourself.
Troy |
