Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (76684)	10/24/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) of 1572620

Elmer, Athlon TOTALLY DESTROYS Coppermine and Carmel... You posted some SPEC scores where some compiler tweaks were used for Coppermine that weren't used for Athlon. Now take a look at what happens when they run the same code: Bapco SYSmark for NT: AMD 650 - 584 AMD 700 - 607 INTC 667 - 310 INTC 733 - 330 intc scores from www.intel.com amd scores from www.amd.com Bapco is real world applications benchmark - it actually runs a mixture of Microsoft Office apps, Corel, and a few others. This is how the processors perform on real applications instead of arbitrary benchmarks with one CPU using compiler tweaks and the other not using compiler tweaks. This is what happens when both run the same code. To tell you the truth, I'm a little surprised by this huge difference, but it's hard to argue with the two manufacturer sites. Maybe you can check them out and identify some configuration differences - I didn't see any significant ones, other than Intel was using a workstation class motherboard with two rambus channels while AMD was using plain old PC100. Dan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next