Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (76779)	10/25/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) of 1570342

Kenith - <Will you be willing to provide yours and the roadmaps to prove him wrong?> No, because that amount of specificity would violate my NDA. And it would be stupid for Charles to provide those names, as his sources are violating the spirit of theirs, even though the information re: Cumine is ostensibly wrong. I'm not saying these yay-hoos don't belive what they're saying. I do, however, doubt they have any meaningful visibility on either P858 or Coppermine development. Intel execs have stated repeatedly that Coppermine will scale in MHz. I work in that department. I back up those statements. Either believe Charles' inside sources, believe me and Intel execs, or believe what you want. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next