SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corp: Digital Storage
AMPX 7.825-0.1%2:13 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: papa bear who wrote (2546)4/10/1997 10:54:00 PM
From: Aaron Kind   of 3256
 
The attorneys fees in AMPEX's suit would not be awarded by the jury but
rather by the court in a seperate hearing to be held at a latter date.
Typically the award of attorneys fees is permissable when provided for
in a contract between the parties OR when the suit makes a claim under
the provisions of a statute. Although I am not familiar with claims of
this sort (Patent) I feel confident that AMPEX's attorneys were able to
carve out a claim which would enable them to be awarded fees by the
defendant. Once again such an award is made by the court at a latter
hearing and not the jury.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News