SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (76958)10/25/1999 10:43:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) of 1577811
 
Ten, re:<After all, when you have a FSB that consumes 1.06 GB/sec of a 1.6 GB/sec RDRAM channel, you've only got 0.54 GB/sec left for everything else (AGP-4x, PCI66, UDMA, ...)>

540 MB/sec is a heck of a bandwidth, and actually, balances the 1.06G/sec of the CPU channel quite well.

First, its very rare that 1.06G/sec is used by a CPU running at 733 MHz.
Second AGP is used to transfer textures from main memory to the graphics board. Nobody uses textures larger than a couple megabytes. If we had a hundred of these a second, we'd only use up 200 MB/sec.
Third, no hard disk transfers faster than 20MB/sec sustained, maybe 40 MB/sec peak. Even a RAID array would be less than 100 MB/sec.
Fourth, it would be very unlikely for all of these activities (peak CPU<->memory bandwidth, peak HD transfer, peak texture transfer) to ever occur at the same time, but if they did, we still only used up 2/3 of our spare I/O capacity.

The i840 I/O bandwidth makes sense ONLY for an SMP system.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext