SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Tuggle who wrote (2529)6/6/1996 12:20:00 PM
From: Janice Shell   of 58324
 
Dear Tom--I had a look at some PRST threads this morning, and rumor has it, apparently, that Cabot employees are (or now perhaps were) holding large amounts of the stock. Maybe true, maybe not, maybe ethically dicey, maybe not. But the perception--and in terms of short term market movement that's what counts--is that the whole Cabot-PRST relationship is unusual and perhaps worthy of investigation. Nowadays IOMG makes the news a lot, unfortunately more often than not in the company of PRST, Diana, OCCF, IDID and the like. Not the same kind of company at all, of course, but the continuing portrayal of it as a kind of mindless momentum stock has taken its toll. And now we have the PRST debacle. As we've seen, one contributor so far today asks whether IOMG should be considered in the same light. In my view, yes, Cabot's pronouncements should be viewed with suspicion, and yes, poor IOMG's been done damage. Buyers will probably be cautious in the near term. What we need are a couple of stunning announcements, though on the other hand the management might do well to wait till the PRST hoopla dies down a bit.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext