SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%Nov 28 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (31218)10/27/1999 7:11:00 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
Brian, Actually i have not played the banking sector. I might only add a couple of banks for diversification. Since you brought it up, maybe that is what i should do (XLF trusts).

I usually invest in technology and probably keep doing so for most of my portfolio. Maybe the HP news was the signal of the bottoming of this sector. Maybe mutual funds will start looking to first quarter of 2000 as the focus and not just the current quarter. If that is the case, Microsoft should do better than the rest of the techs and will probably be one of the first PC related stocks to start getting buying interest. This is simply because they have not sounded any Y2K alarm bells. To me that is a sign that it should be one of the first stocks to get bought along with Intel, gateway, apple, and maybe Dell---the IBMs, HPs etc would be bought when the goods ones have been pushed up a lot. If i was a fund manager, that is how i would proceed with this sector.

I wonder if there is any other company like IBM, CPQ etc.. that is still to announce Y2K problems. I understand SUNW said they had no Y2K concerns. What company is left?
Maybe we have bottomed out in this sector----I realize this is contrary to what i stated in my earlier post but i am thinking about this possibility as well.

Just some of my thoughts---maybe i am way off base.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext