Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (77657)	10/28/1999 10:22:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) of 1574488

Nice job of posting selective benchmarks. The benchmarks you posted from Toms page were ALL 800MHz kryotech benchmarks. Rather deceptive. The ones from Anands page were mostly victories for CuMine even though you chose to ignore the much better scores posted for the i840/CuMine combination. Why not compare the official scores posted on each company's own webpage. Bench marks like: SPECInt95 CuMine 35.6 The highest score ever posted by anyone Athlon 31.7 WinBench 99 CPUmark 99 CuMine 67.5 Athlon 64.4 Winstone 99 Business on WinNT CuMine 39.8 Athlon 37.6 WinBench 99 Transform and Lighting CuMine 106 Athlon 96.4 And Floating Point! SPECfp95 CuMine 30.4 Compiler difference? Athlon 24.0 WinBench 99-FPU WinMark 99-Win98 CuMine 3920 No special Intel compiler used here!!! Athlon 3810 So Cringe, you can go find phoney cryo cooled benchmarks or deceptive ones which ignore better Intel scores, or you can simply go to each company's website and compare the official scores. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next