Border Capital faces limited interlocutory injuction in Dion dispute Dion Entertainment Corp DIO Shares issued 54,546,904 Oct 29 close $1.40 Fri 29 Oct 99 News Release See Border Capital Corp (BOP) News Release Mr. Michael Holley reports The court has decided to grant a limited interlocutory injunction against respondents, Border, IBC Investments Limited and their related parties (Border group) in favour of the petitioners, Louis Dion, Leo Dion and others (Dion group). The Dion group has been directed by the court to post security in the amount of $1-million. As the court initially indicated that it would give oral reasons for judgment on Nov. 2, 1999, the court has suggested that counsel for the litigants use the time set for hearing on Nov. 2, 1999, to settle the precise terms for a limited injunction to reflect the court's findings, and consequences of the failure or inability of the Dion group to post $1-million in security. Management for the Border group will provide a further report following the court hearing on Nov, 2, 1999. (c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com
Dions ordered to post $1-million for injunction Dion Entertainment Corp DIO Shares issued 54,546,904 Oct 29 close $1.40 Fri 29 Oct 99 Street Wire Also Border Capital Corp (BOP) by Brent Mudry Howe Street stock and bingo promoters Louis and Leo Dion have scored a mixed win in court in their petition against Border Capital, IBC Investments and their associated responsdents. In a 17-page decision released Friday in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Mr. Justice Thomas Melnick ruled that the Dion brothers are entitled to an interim injunction to preserve the status quo of a disputed arbitration agreement. The judge, however, ordered the Dions and their associated private companies to post a security deposit of $1-million. The speedy decision comes a week after a two-day hearing ended on Oct. 22. Dion Entertainment is not a party to the court petition. Judge Melnick ruled that the Dions should provide a serious undertaking for damages if the Border group ultimately wins the case. "I am not satisfied that the petitioners have demonstrated that they have the financial ability to give a meaningful undertaking," stated the judge. The Border group requested a $6.8-million good-faith deposit, representing the amount Border has invested to date, but Judge Melnick found that a smaller, but still substantial, amount was more appropriate. The judge noted that he originally indicated his plan to hand down oral reasons on Tuesday, Nov. 2, but since he finished the job early, he invited lawyers for both sides to meet in court that day to discuss the appropriate wording for the injunction. (c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com |