Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 101.44

+3.5%

Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: d:oug who wrote (44330)	10/29/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) of 116756

I did not accuse Butler of fraud - he accused Barrick of fraud! Get hold of Barrick's Annual Report - visit it's website. Butler clearly has not done his homework. It isn't up to Barrick to prove they aren't fraudulent - but it may be up to Butler to defend himself against libel or slander. Barrick may decide to ignore him, and this may be the wisest course with a pest - I don't know what happened to his 'open letter to Peter Munk' for example. He himself wonders why he hasn't been sued for libel -it's difficult to bring a libel case in the States - however just your cause - and there is a downside for the plaintiff - so it's possible that Barrick's attorneys would advise against such an action, I don't know - just as many articles in tabloids go unchallenged. You keep admitting that you haven't a clue as to what is going on - just let it rest there - if you haven't a clue, and I'm quite prepared to agree that you are correct -g- why do you believe Butler? If you haven't a clue - why do you believe anyone for that matter, including Barrick? Because if you haven't a clue you are in no position to know who to believe. d

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next