Gee, Boris, you'd really think that someone with the esteemed Dr Geist's credentials would realize that "ad hominem" (or, as the case may be, "ad feminam") isn't one word. Snicker.
For example, a CEO might be attacked because one of his or her shareholders had been involved in an unrelated shady deal ten years ago; thus, by implication, the reader takes away the idea that the CEO might be dishonest also.
What utter BS. I've never seen anyone say anything that stupid. Rather obviously, most large companies are likely to have shareholders who've been in trouble. Note also that most large (and small) companies have no idea who their shareholders are, given that most people's accounts are held in street name.
If you were attempting to refer all this to HITT, well, sorry. Ain't anonymous shareholders who've had teeny tiny problems with the law. It's Dorian, founder and majority shareholder at 60%. Got nailed twice for fraud, didn't he? Spent 10 months at Club Fed the first time round, but did that stop him? Nah...
But hey, Boris: let's talk about "psychology". The illustrious Dr Geist had his head handed to him by Asensio over SolvEx. The illustrious Dr Geist has a stockpicking track record almost as bad as your own.
Do these two facts suggest to you why the illustrious Dr Geist just may feel extremely resentful (as you, do, Boris) of the people who were right about the stocks he was so very wrong about?
lolol, of course!! |
