Gran Colombia Resources Inc (TSE.GRM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gran Colombia Resources Inc (TSE.GRM)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steven Brates who wrote (168)	4/11/1997 7:18:00 PM
From: sana	of 308

Steven Why didn't Gran Colombia move with these results? Fair question... some great g/ton readings but look at your average thickness 2.70 (m). They go on to report, "The high grade mineralization has been intersected in two sections spaced 50m apart..." I would assume the people in the know did not feel the area plus thickness justified a large an increase in GRM's price. Just a footnote CQL has I believe 8 (could be 9) other properties described by CQL management as having, "world class potential," whatever that means. It could also be the 'experts' feel CQL,s Marmato/Zona Alta project as a greater potential. And finally one cannot discount the Bre-X 'effect' on all these stocks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next