The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company

QCOM 171.54

+0.4%

Nov 10 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: P2V who wrote (2830)	10/31/1999 9:43:00 AM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (2) of 13582

Mardy: Thanks for the info and the link. Since you have followed all this through the "holy wars" to date, and have followed the weaving track of spec's, etc. on WCDMA, given all the current lack of specificity of the specifications et al, do you see that any user of WCDMA will have to pay royalties to both the Q and wi-Lan? You have said yes re wi-Lan; Gregg Powers said yes re the Q. Are you both right - or to put it better - is it your view that a user of WCDMA will have to pay both companies? Note: Don't wi-Lan's patents apply only for fixed wireless, not mobile? So isn't it only if WCDMA is used for fixed wireless (separate from mobile or in addition to mobile) that wi-Lan's patents apply? Chaz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next