SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks
NN 13.98+0.9%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pat mudge who wrote (14119)10/31/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: MangoBoy  Read Replies (2) of 18016
 
I'm having a hard time understanding the "You don't go to trial if you're not sure of your position" rule.

LU sues NN (Goliath v. David): LU is being a brow-beating lawyer-driven opportunist; NN's decision to not settle is proof that NN is in the right and will prevail because YDGTTIYNSOYP.

ECI sues TXN (David v. Goliath): ECI is being a brow-beating lawyer-driven opportunist; TXN's decision to not settle is proof that TXN is in the right and will prevail because YDGTTIYNSOYP.

ALA v. ORCT (Goliath v. David): ALA is being a brow-beating lawyer-driven opportunist? ORCT's decision to not settle and let the matter be resolved in the courts is proof that ORCT is in the right and will prevail because YDGTTIYNSOYP?

A hypothetical:

TXN sues ORCT (Goliath v. David) over ADSL patents. ORCT elects to not settle and let the matter be resolved in the courts. Would this be proof of ORCT's being in the right and will prevail because YDGTTIYNSOYP? Is TXN being a brow-beating lawyer-driven opportunist?

Your comments over the years have always led me to believe you'd back TXN in such a suit but YDGTTIYNSOYP suggests you'd expect ORCT to prevail.

----

Does YDGTTIYNSOYP only apply to defendants but not to plaintiffs?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext