SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.560-2.5%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hank who wrote (4492)10/31/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) of 10293
 
You're claims of 100% efficacy are ludicrous.

Think about it Hank. Paul said:

Of family and friends that have tried Zicam, the success rate is running around 100%, of shortening their colds.

He is, after all, referring to GUMM bulls. Many are people who are in the stock because it worked for them. Any way, why wouldn't that sample be very high ("around 100%"), the "wild virus" clinical had a <p of .001 or 50 times better than "statistically significant"> Any way you put it the success ratio is dramatic.

So, it didn't work for you. You didn't make much of an effort to make the experiment look like you were unbiased. You have never even hinted at an open mind. Why should anyone have believed that you were legitimate?

What is perplexing is this comment:

Just like the ZONA shills, they base all their hopes on management's promises...

uh...and using the product. Also, significant revenue growth year to year.

and future sales figures that never seem to materialize.

This comment is pretty laughable. This quarter would be the first to reflect any serious impact from Zicam.

Hank, you just seem to protest too much.




Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext