SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: charred who wrote (10169)10/31/1999 9:47:00 PM
From: John Dally  Read Replies (1) of 10836
 
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for your reply on the potential reserves. It appears that they need to keep searching!

On another topic, I was looking at the original news release for the SG acquisition:

crystallex.com

It's interesting that at the time, the POG was $295 and the 1998 cash cost was $245, allowing for $50 /oz in cash flow. If one multiplies the $50 / oz by the 420,000 oz of reserves stated, one comes up with $21 million: Pretty close to the $23 million KRY paid. (OK, I know that's obvious.)

Now by lowering the cost of production by $45 / oz, KRY has added value of $45 x 420,000 = $19 million to the mine (as long as the POG averages the $195 / oz it was at the time of the acquisition).

Another way of looking at it, in their earnings reports, they mention that approximately 40% of reserves (roughly 160,000 oz) are sold forward with a price floor of $310. By locking in cash flow of over $100 /oz, that comes to just over $16 million, equal to their SG acquisition loan. (The fact that the interest rate is 3% indicates that the loan is related to gold, as well.)

So, 160,000 oz sold forward covers the $16 million loan, which leaves 260,000 oz with cash cost of $200 / oz for which they paid $7 million.

Thanks again for your input,

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext