SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Whodunit? Two Stockbrokers Murdered in Jersey; No Clues

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Janice Shell who wrote (466)11/2/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) of 1156
 
Janice,

Aahhh... no. Don't think so.

Conkling and X call the victims at around 7:30, a few minutes from the house

Not likely to be able to do so without leaving behind records of the call. Why? Conkling lived a good distance away, so if he called from home there'd be a telephone record of it. If they used a mobile or cell phone, all those calls are recorded. If they used a pay phone, all of those calls are recorded as well. The only way a call could have happened without leaving a record of it is if the call was placed from within the calling area on a private telephone line. And that might mean that there would be someone out there that could say they used my telephone...

And, had Conkling used any weapon he'd have left residues on his person and on his clothing that you just can't easily rid yourself of. I'm certain that the NJ authorities are competent enough to have ruled out the possibility that Conkling was involved in the commission of the actual crime.

As far as leaving behind physical evidence (say strands of hair or something), that could easily be dismissed presuming that this was not the first time Conkling had visited the estate.

No, I think Mr. Conkling (and friend) is not guilty of this one.

KJC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext