SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 96.29+2.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (33563)11/2/1999 1:59:00 AM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Anyone can play that game. We see too much of that on the AMD thread. You know what that's called? Partisanship.

Correct. I don't like it either.

But the 820 delay means that DDR now has a fighting chance, not because DDR is inherently better (it isn't, despite your arguments to the contrary), but because those on the Rambus side fumbled the ball.

I think the effect of the delay is overstated, actually. Intel had already decided to do PC133, so it's not clear what changes.

Thinking long term (2+ years) for a minute...I don't know what the "next next" generation of PC memory will be, but I'm quite sure it won't be 16 bits wide. 64+ bits is easy, pins get cheaper, and bandwidth needs grow. It's a mystery to me why Intel opted for a narrow memory bus. Multiple narrow channels on multiple RIMMs are not cost effective compared with a single wide channel on a single module (where a single chip doesn't have to provide the full width, but it could).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext