Attention Calypso!
I understand that the entity you mentioned, on whose
opinion YOU would rely, to verify encryption products,
such as the one you mentioned from JAWS, charges $50000
to express a lowly held opinion!!!
This money, blood money, is also for the privilege of giving PUBLIC access to PRIVATE
source code, with no guarauntee of non-disclosure, or,
that the information would not be sold for an additional gain, to a competitor.
I understand that even if security were offered, the arse is hanging out of the trousers of the entity you refer to,
so that they would'nt have the itch if they were dying
for a scratch!!!
A case of all fur coat....and no knickers!!
I am happy that the veracity of JAWZ claims were
scrutinized by Ernst & Young and that there are qualified
experts galore in ASP consortium, who would quickly bring
any such claims as yours to bear on Jawz!!!
Finally, I wont be back...I do apologise to the other members of the Baltimore thread...for up[setting your calm.
I suspect there were'nt many to witrness the exchange between
Calypso and myself... I understand now why there is such a low visitor rate and posting rate on the Baltimore
thread...given the DRAGON you have standing sentry at the door......stifles all debate, and dominates the thread!!
Goodbye!!!!!!!!! |
