SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 175.34+0.1%10:21 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 100cfm who wrote (47451)11/3/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: cfoe  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Sorry if I wasn't clear. John Biddle's response to you about accounting in

siliconinvestor.com

was accurate and good background for the following.

What I was talking about relates to "segment" accounting which QCOM was now doing (it sounded like in response to analysts requests). It means showing each segment of the business - handsets, ASICS, royalties, etc. as if they "stood on their own." That is what I was referring to. Segment accounting is another form of "proforma reporting" that John referred to. The offsetting revenue and expense show up in the related segment.

In actuality, even if they "booked" these internal royalties as an expense on one side - they would be booking an offsetting revenue on the other. These offsetting internal transaction then cancel each other out (they call these "eliminating entries" and the accountants and auditors look for these when they do the annual audit).

So in summary, there is no voodoo accounting to worry about, no phantom profits. In fact, handset division sale should be accretive next year (after 1st quarter) since I believe they said on the cc that when fully charged (for royalties and ASICS) the handset division lost money this year.

Hope this helps and is not too long winded.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext