Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Exacctnt who wrote (70109)	11/5/1999 11:15:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (2) of 132070

Ex, The comments stood after your amendments. The down quarter comments just prove my memory is faulty as I don't follow MSFT that closely. What is the point in analyzing a price gouging monopoly? And isn't it odd that MSFT picked a stinko quarter in which to discover that they had to dip into unearned revenues? <g> But my main problem is that MSFT displayed this quarter as "proof" that pc sales were great, when it wasn't a very hot quarter. If MSFT is your core holding, do you have a bomb shelter for the judge's ruling? <g> Actually, I don't know what he is going to say. The case definitely proved that MSFT was guilty as hell of unfair, monopolistic trade practices, but, then, they do give a lot of money to the guys who appoint judges. <g>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next