Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (78749)	11/5/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) of 1574059

Charles - <The question is technically inappropriate given that K7 exists and Wilamette does not.> OK. Fair enough. I'm getting ahead of myself. However, I do believe that the overall timing of various aspects of the product to design game will be integral to how the competitive landscape plays out over the next year. I stipulate that this is in the realm of speculation. As for the moment, I believe Intel has shown that Coppermine has brought to bear a very competitive line of products. I also believe that there will be enough legs in Coppermine to maintain its competitive position for the amount of time required. Again, I stipulate that this premise incorporates forward looking statements :-). <P.S.: In my not so humble opinion, people who argue PIII-core is competitive with K7-core should bone up on computer architecture so that they could stop losing further credibility.> I will stipulate that I rely on some architecture savvy friends and contacts in order to draw my conclusions. As for the moment, the fact that the side by side comparisons of K7 vs. Coppermine are coming out a dead heat in aggregate seem to confirm my source's veracity, at least in my mind. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next