<The demand just got halved.>
How so? If you are referring to the post that Gunn Allen customers can no longer margin GUMM, the demand didn't get halved. Even if the demand from that one brokerage firm got halved, it wouldn't have a significant effect on the stock.
<we shall see, won't we?>
The last time you wrote this, the stock was at about $12. Now it's $5 higher.
<But I know the facts and I've been here so many times with crims like these, in fact these same guys.>
What facts and what guys are you referring to as crims? I'm sure that they would like to know that you just libeled them on a public bulletin board. Assuming that you are referring to Gunn Allen, they have been buying GUMM for a couple of years, and during that time, the stock has traded from below 5 to the recent high at 19. Whatever you think you know hasn't hurt the stock price, and I suspect that the stock price will continue to trend higher based on positive bullish fundamentals. I guess you don't know much about those since you have spent all of your time studying a broker.
BTW, I have heard some not so good things about Fiero Brothers. He (there's only one) is known to have shorted GUMM a couple of years ago. While you are investigating market makers, you might want to check him out too. No accusations coming from me, but you might just find that there's more crim there than at Gunn Allen. I think you might find some violations against Fiero, although Gunn Allen is clean as a whistle.
Have a nice weekend.
Dan |
