SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.53-1.1%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (91850)11/7/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Dan, <OS and mass distribution application costs have stayed absurdly high compared to the drop in hardware costs>

I'm sure even you would think that requiring Microsoft to charge no more than the cost of materials and shipping is going a little too far.

This is a complicated issue, no doubt. How much should a software company charge for its products? Why do some applications like office suites cost hundreds of dollars, when there is free software like StarOffice out there? Why should MS get away with charging $80 for a Windows upgrade (and $200 for a full version), when Linux is being given away for free? And in a somewhat related note, why should recording companies charge $12 to $19 per CD, when people can download music off the Internet for much less?

I think the comparison between the diving prices of hardware and the steady prices of software is kind of invalid.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext