SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Jackson who wrote (78943)11/7/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) of 1573863
 
Bill,

re"Are those others left alone because they use Intel CPUs?"

Well I don't think it so.
The others are left alone so far because they do not publicly support the Athlon.
End of story.

Going by this:
ebnews.com
and it is the only hint we have as to what the details may be,
iNhEL is after the Apollo Pro, MVP4 chipsets, and the 686 Southbridge.

These are the mobos I looked at so far, of mobo manufacturers who are not being attacked by iNhEL yet. (sorry if I may have made any errors)

Aopen: Uses the VIA MVP4, Apollo Pro Plus and the Apollo Pro 133 chipsets.

ASUS: Uses the Apollo Pro Plus chipset.

Tyan: Uses the Apollo Pro 133A chipset and another board uses the 686 Southbridge from a MVP4 combined with a MVP3 Northbridge.

SOYO: Apollo Pro chipset

ABIT: All Intel chipsets (thought I'd throw it in since I looked at their boards too)

Of course these companies are rumored to have Athlon boards coming out, but we will see. ASUS is the first to be rumored to have been pressured without a direct lawsuit because their K7M uses the 686 Southbridge.

I think iNhEL is playing with matches.

steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext