WDC/Sandisk Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation

WDC 157.75

+0.4%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: orkrious who wrote (8019)	11/8/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Ausdauer	Read Replies (1) of 60323

Jay, re: The Lexar Suit The general counsel's name is not listed in any of the documents I found and the Lexar patent is not mentioned either (U.S. patent patent No. 5,388,083). Also, SanDisk's patent infringement suit (that I referenced) was begun in 1998, not 1995. Also, the court locations appear different... The current press release indicates the following venue: US Patent and Trademark Office as well as a "a three judge panel of the US Patent Board of Appeals and Interferences", not Judge Charles Breyer who is presiding over the suit I mentioned. I am not certain, but it appears that there are several concurrent suits going on here. I will double check my references here. I am still waiting for some faxes from a court document service I ordered over a week and a half ago. This may explain why SanDisk is seeking "partial summary judgement" in the information I referenced recently. Perhaps this contested patent has been cut out of a "summary judgement". Ausdauer

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next