SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors
AMTX 1.950-5.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pat mudge who wrote (14161)4/14/1997 3:12:00 AM
From: SteveG   of 31386
 
<Incidentally, I'm too tired to respond to SteveG's post. I sent him half my archives about 2 months ago and judging by his comments, he
hasn't read a word. There comes a time you have to concede someone's shorting and just let it ride>

Pat, I am dissappointed-

In my apologies to you, I hope I haven't overestimated your earnestness here.

Yes, you have very generously sent me some material, all of which I have in fact read, and could post here, if necessary. Unfortunately none of which answers my post's questions.

Thomas Calvert did offer a response, which I am glad to be able to consider. As I said, I was in the stock once, lost a bit, am interested in the technology, and am open to getting back in. Though this time, I will dig deeper as evidenced by voicing my questions and concerns here.

My recent suggestion that you were financially sponsored by AMTX to attend a conference, prompted your understandably emphatic and indignant denial. I retracted my statement and apologized for my suggestion.

You suggested at the time that the motivation for my post was that I was short the stock and was trying to manipulate the market (purportedly by calling into question on SI the exact nature of your relationship with Amati. And while I am aware and respectful of your high visibility on this forum, I offered that I doubted that either news or speculation concerning you could effect the stock's price). I had in my apology clarified that I am not, nor have I ever been short the stock. Yet you continue to suggest that I am short, in effect, calling me a liar, and worse, suggesting that my questions are meant to mislead. Or do I misunderstand?

So perhaps we are now more than even *.... we have both now questioned each others full and honest disclosure here. (*with the exception of my apologies to you and everyone on the board for my unprovable suggestion)

I fully admitted to finding that I was completely mistaken about my ability to substantiate my suggestions about your relationship with Amati. But I am neither a liar nor a conniver. If my current questions can be satisfactorily answered, I look forward to it. If not, Amati may still be a fine company to own.

If the price goes down, and some bulls *know* the REAL value, what an opportunity anyone who sells their stock then presents!

Regards-
Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext