SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Monsanto Co.
MTC 3.700+18.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SteveR who wrote (2492)11/9/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: SteveR  Read Replies (1) of 2539
 
More on the possible MTC/Novartis combination.
From Yahoo finance (http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/991109/ju.html):

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday November 9, 8:01 am Eastern Time
Novartis/Monsanto link poses cartel snag -analysts
By Michael Shields

ZURICH, Nov 9 (Reuters) - Novartis AG's reported interest in life sciences rival Monsanto Co (NYSE:MTC - news) faces serious anti-trust problems given the companies' big agribusinesses, equity analysts said on Tuesday.

This could kill any deal unless the firms find a creative way to handle the problem, they said, but the report fuelled talk that Novartis is hunting for a takeover to prevent being shunted from centre stage in a fast-consolidating drugs sector.

Novartis said on Tuesday it had no comment on a newspaper report that it was interested in buying all or part of U.S.-based Monsanto Co.

The Wall Street Journal, in an article published on Tuesday, said Monsanto had been holding talks about a sale of all or part of the company, and Novartis had emerged as a serious suitor.

''Because Novartis and Monsanto have a rather big share in the agrochemicals market, we would likely see significant anti-trust problems if you would combine the two agribusinesses. That is my major concern,'' said Birgit Kulhoff at Lombard Odier.

She estimated they had a combined 25 percent market share.

Eric Bernhardt at Clariden Bank also saw cartel problems if Monsanto did not agree to split itself up into parts and sell just its G.D. Searle drugs business.

But Michael Sjoestrom at Pictet & Cie thought the approach reported in the Wall Street Journal made sense.

''Novartis obviously knows the agribusiness pretty well because they are in it themselves, so they are a likely acquirer of both parts of Monsanto,'' he said.

Novartis already seems likely to spin off its own agribusiness, which has been suffering amid a global downturn in the farm sector, and could combine this with Monsanto's agriculture division, Sjoestrom said.

''There is apparently not that much overlap between the two businesses. There may be anti-trust issues, namely Bt corn in the U.S. market, maybe some issues on the research front, but other than that I think a solution could be found.''

NOVARTIS HAS LARGE WAR CHEST

He suggested Novartis, whose war chest has 20 billion Swiss francs ($12.93 billion) in cash, could finance a cash bid for Monsanto and pay a premium of some 10 to 20 percent over the current market price.

After a slow start, Novartis shares were up 29 francs or 1.2 percent to 2,427 around 1220 GMT.

Novartis while declining comment on the report provided a statement it had given a Swiss newspaper late last week for a story on the impact of Warner-Lambert Co's (NYSE:WLA - news) agreed $69 billion offer for American Home Products Corp (NYSE:AHP - news).

Pfizer Inc (NYSE:PFE - news) has since launched a hostile $74.6 billion bid for Warner-Lambert.

Asked what Novartis was looking for in a potential takeover candidate, the company said: ''A strong presence in the United States and in a quickly growing therapeutic area would be one of a number of desirable criteria.''

It said high prices for drugs companies were not exaggerated when compared to what telecommunications and Internet companies commanded, but stressed it was not under pressure to act because it had many promising new drugs in its development pipeline.

Swiss analysts were less sure that Novartis could afford to stand idle if two big U.S. drugs groups join forces.

''Then critical mass in the United States, at least in terms of marketing, will get bigger. In the medium term it still increases the pressure (on Novartis) a bit,'' Sjoestrom said.

''Keep in mind that when Sandoz and Ciba merged (in 1996 to form Novartis), Novartis was the largest pharmaceuticals company. Now they are number seven, so it's moving quite fast.''

Bernhardt agreed that Novartis could not relax.

''Their product pipeline is not outstanding and they will not grow strongly next year, so they are under presssure to do something,'' he said.

He suggested Novartis could aim for American Home Products.

''I'm not saying it will happen, but it will be an interesting option,'' he said, noting AHP also had problems with its agribusiness, but had a good pipeline and would complement Novartis well geographically.

Any such bid would have to be in cash, given U.S. investors' probable reluctance to accept relatively undervalued shares from a foreign company, he said.

($1 equals 1.547 Swiss Franc)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext