SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 485.49+1.8%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: art slott who wrote (33413)11/9/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
art:

That article is kinda wrong. O/S2 was a flop all by itself. The reason it failed is that IBM tied it to P/S2. You might remember this, if you were in the business back in ~1987.

IBM wanted to recreate the monopoly they had on the PC industry before companies like Chips and Technologies reverse engineered the secret IBM bios chip.

People were too smart. Even today, there are some IBM pc's out there THAT CANNOT BE MODIFIED WITHOUT GOING TO IBM AND PAYING $200 for an IBM nic card. (a clone card costs $13)

MSFT didn't put an end to this. MSFT wrote a operating system, that although was not 'quite as good' as O/S2 allowed me not to be locked into the IBM monopoly.

Personally, I don't think this is bad for consumers, do you?

Although you do have a point.

It certainly did damage IBM.

You're right on another point too, if you tell the Big Lie long enough, it works.

Duke
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext