Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB)

SLUP 0.00001000

0.0%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: hawkeye who wrote (3075)	11/9/1999 4:30:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Read Replies (4) of 3679

DEAR MR. WALKER, HOW IS IT HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO TAKE 19 MONTHS TO INVESTIGATE A COMPANY THE SIZE OF SOLUCORP ?????????????????? WHEN WILL THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION CONSIDER THE STAFF'S CASE AGAINST SOLUCORP ?????????????? WHEN WILL THE SEC DISCLOSE TO THE INVESTING PUBLIC WHAT IT IS THAT SOLUCORP HAS DONE WRONG???? WHEN CAN WE EXPECT TO BE NOTIFIED OF THE RESULTS OF THE SEC'S 19+ MONTH-LONG INVESTIGATION???????????? WHEN WILL THE SEC MAKE A PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE SPECIFIC, HARD EVIDENCE IT HAS AMASSED AGAINST SOLUCORP THAT PROVES THAT IT HAS COMMITTED AN EREGIOUS FRAUD ON THE INVESTING PUBLIC???? WHEN WILL THE SEC PUT ITSELF IN THE SHOES OF A SOLUCORP SHAREHOLDER TO SEE HOW THE COMMISSION"S HANDLING OF THE SOLUCORP CASE LOOKS FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN ??????? WHAT, IF ANYTHING, PREVENTS THE SEC FROM TAKING FORMAL ACTION TO PROTECT THE INVESTING PUBLIC AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY "TEMPORARY' SUSPENSION PERIOD? WHAT ARE THE POLICY REASONS THAT JUSTIFY NOT DISCLOSING ANY EVIDENCE OR FINDINGS OR OTHERWISE TAKING A JUDICIALLY REVIEWABLE ACTION AGAINST A COMPANY AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY "TEMPORARY" SUSPENSION PERIOD? CAN YOU GIVE ME THE CITATIONS TO ANY FEDERAL COURT CASES DECIDED SINCE SLOAN V SEC WHERE THE SEC's CURRENT PRACTICES RESPECTING ITS 12(K) TEMPORARY SUSPENSION AUTHORITY HAVE BEEN APPROVED OR IN ANY OTHER WAY BLESSED BY THE COURTS? WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE 10 OTHER COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK WAS SUBJECT TO SEC IMPOSED TRADING HALTS IN 1998??? DO ANY OF THOSE COMPANIES HAVE REAL BUSINESSES AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN EMPTY MINESHAFTS AND PRODUCTS THAT EXIST ONLY ON PAPER AND IN THE IMAGINATIONS OF INVESTORS??? HOW MANY OF THOSE TEN OTHER COMPANIES HOLD PATENTS ON A BENEFICIAL TECHNOLOGY THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY AN EXECUTIVE-LEVEL US GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND WHICH IS BEING FURTHER PROVEN EVERYDAY IN THE REAL WORLD????? DO THE SEC'S POLICIES RESPECTING ENFORCEMNT INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS IN ANY WAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE INTERESTS OF A COMPANY'S EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS????? IF NOT, WHY NOT???? DOES THE COMMISSION EVER DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC THE RECORD EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE COMMISSION DECIDED THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, THE POTENTIALY DEVASTATING REMEDY OF A TRADING SUSPENSION IS REQUIRED???????? IF NOT, WHY NOT??????????????? hAWKEYE (not HAWKEYE, CITIZEN, USofA)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next