SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hpeace who wrote (6672)4/14/1997 12:59:00 PM
From: Bill Ounce   of 39621
 
Steve,

When I checked things out, I did much more than just watch T.V.
I became familiar with numerous "beliefs" of Biblical Creationism out there. Ther`re all perfectly OK with me, as long as these "beliefs" are not taught as science, or attack science with invalid arguments. Dishonesty for the gain of religion is a serious sin to me.

It is enlightening to hear your "Most solid info is in Bible...not a TV set." A scientific theory does not use a Holy book for support, it uses empirical evidence.

I am well aware of the Gap/Replenishment theories. The logic used is very similar to the following Steven Wright joke:

Last Saturday, I woke up and found that all my personal possessions had been stolen and replaced with exact duplicates.

I've seen lots of books. They almost always have the following deceptive arguments:

* Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
* Evolution is only a theory; it hasn't been proved, it can't be falsified.
* Evolution has never been observed.
* There are no transitional fossils.
* The theory of evolution says that life originated, and evolution proceeds, by random chance.


When books contain the above quackery, I have zero credibility for their "emmmense amount of study out there".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext