SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 174.01-0.3%Nov 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 100cfm who wrote (48953)11/10/1999 6:34:00 PM
From: Cooters  Read Replies (2) of 152472
 
<<isn't 100pe a little too high or does anyone think they'll do better then $6.>>

I would answer the question in two parts:

A) As a voice only company envisioning no new businesses other than a normal CDMA expansion, 100pe is too high.

B) As an emerging wireless data technology provider, both fixed, mobile, and both(whichever you want), I would say the PE must be forward looking. The analogy I would provide is the drug company of your choice(SYN in 60's, AMGN in 80's). If they had received approval for their initial blockbuster drug, but had not shipped it yet, how important would you consider trailing earnings. Minimal, right?

Ok, well then how should we value the trailing earnings when they do not include data revenues. I don't have the answer, but clearly this price move comes on the heals of the comments during the earnings CC and the HDR CC.

To summarize, I think you cannot use trailing earnings when the business model is changing this drastically. Forward earnings are really difficult to predict and subject to constant revision, but here we are.

Respectfully,

Cooters
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext