SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mooter775 who wrote (15954)11/11/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: MGV  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Now you are a liar on 3 counts. Great revisionism though - pathlogical revisionism.

The wager, which you have ducked and run from, was and is total portfolio return from 11/1/98 to 10/31/99. The amount was $10,000 and with the publication of your returns, if they are truthful, I would be pleased to increase the amount. As before the challenge is to compare documented total return on personal portfolios - i.e. registered under my social security number versus portfolios registered under your social security number.

The challenge was made because you made a statement about some stock picks. Apparently you were all noise. The challenge remains. your paragraph 2 is a lie becasue the record shows - and you know it does -that the challenge was at all times specific to the period 11/1/98 to 10/31/99. That is, it was not an open-ended "October to October" of the forward year. The year was specific for a reason. You made a statement about previous picks. I figured if you had any balls with regard to your word, you would accept the challenge. I wasn't surprised when you did not. Your low character is written all over you and your pal eli.

"(2) So he responded with a challenge of sorts, ie, to measure investment returns over a year period from the end of October (1998) to the end of October (1999)."

The challenge I made remains. Are you going to duck and run again and then try pathological revisionism a week or two later - again?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News