SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 485.36-1.7%3:01 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Tutt who wrote (33912)11/14/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Re: Would the Dept. of Justice agree to a consent decree?

Everything costs money and time. DOJ has a limited budget and limited staff. The President, moreover, has a history of making compromises, over and above any principles.

A consent decree with the proper safeguards, as pointed out in the latest issue of The Economist (their lead article, incidentally) could be as effective as most any other remedy and would cost the government much, much less. As far as monetary damages go, that's for the various parties to consider in the form of individual suits. A consent decree would not necessarily preclude states and foreign governments, in addition to individual companies, from pursuing other remedies. But it would be more difficult for Microsoft to defend against separate damage suits if the court finds against them on the facts AND the law. So far, the only finding is on the facts, and that's bad enough.

As I've noted in earlier comments, the only reason for refusing to come to an out-of-court settlement is ego.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext