SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 163.32+2.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3309)11/15/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
AT&T Seeks Non-Infringement Ruling on Cell Phone System Patent


Seattle, Washington, Nov. 15 (Bloomberg) -- AT&T Wireless Services Inc., the world's top cellular phone system operator, asked a federal judge to rule it's not infringing a mobile phone system patent held by GTE Wireless Inc. by using phones made by the No. 1 cell phone maker, Nokia Oyj of Finland.

In a suit filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle Oct. 29, Redmond, Washington-based AT&T Wireless claims Alpharetta, Georgia-based GTE has already accused Nokia and may accuse AT&T of infringing a GTE patent awarded in March for a system containing remotely programmable cell phones.

AT&T also says Nokia has indicated it will ultimately hold AT&T responsible for GTE's claims of infringement because Nokia makes cell phones for the AT&T system.

''AT&T's sales of Nokia cellular telephones will likely be adversely affected by the continuing threats'' by GTE of patent infringement, AT&T says in the suit. The company asks a judge to rule that neither AT&T, nor Nokia's phones, infringe the GTE patent, and to award damages and legal fees.

Officials of GTE, whose shares rose 1/16 to 73 15/16, could not immediately be reached to comment on the suit. Shares of New York-based AT&T Corp. rose 5/16 to 46. American depositary receipts of Nokia fell 2 1/16 to 120 3/16 in New York.

Where does QCOM fit into this? Will QCOM run in to the same patent infringment?

Greg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext