SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (80132)11/16/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) of 1570742
 
Elmer Re <<I know what the binsplit is but I don't know what the yields are. I can't believe they would get this good a binsplit if there were any kind of yield problem that was defect density related.>>

I certainly can not dispute that binsplit is good, all speed grades are equally scarce.

But if the yields are good then shouldn't we see a lot more Coppermines?

Question, if there exist a yield problem due to high defect density resulting from an immature process, would that also damage binsplit? Do binsplit and yields usually go hand in hand?

All the good stuff that Intel has been saying, along with what you, Paul and PB have been saying here, does not jive with the extreme shortage of parts at all levels. It just doesn't.

Mani
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News