JABA INC.(c.jba) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JABA INC.(c.jba)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alex who wrote (27)	4/15/1997 4:17:00 PM
From: rex	of 1044

Hi Alex: Well, I wish spoke "geo-speak" - this news release has high concentrations! IR tells me that managment is very excited about Yardley right now, yet to me the Cu concentrations found at both sites are similar. At Gap Tank 700ft of core with values to 145ppm Cu are called uneconomic, yet at Yardley 390 feet to 150ppm Cu are extremely encouraging. I don't get it. I also gather the drill had to be moved from Silver Bell to Yardley for a single hole before SB was completed. Does it now go back to SB? Why move before the phase 1 drilling was completed? Perhaps in order to generate new excitement - looking at JBA in the market for the past few months (and even allowing for a heavy Bre-X factor), I would ask if anyone is thrilled with the Silver Bell. Can someone clarify these matters? Good trading to all, -- Jon aka rex

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next