SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (63349)11/17/1999 7:16:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
It was an article about this medical procedure performed on the fetus, and a photo of the head and hand of the fetus... I suppose it was taken during the procedure. They partially removed the fetus I guess and put it back in the womb... I can't get the site up again either.

The problem was that the title of the article was "Medical Miracle" or something, as you read through the text, each paragraph (and there were many) mentioned abortion. "Of course this baby could have been aborted", "abortion would have been a horrible option" etc. etc. - after reading it seemed to be making a pro-life argument vs. discussing this medical matter. I believe it was a poorly cloaked anti-choice propaganda piece.

At first I was trying to argue that with Charlymaine, but it seems nobody contradicted that point (that this was a pro-life piece and not medical material at all)... they were just interested in it for its depiction of partial birth abortions, at which point I can't see Fox airing it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext