SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 496.920.0%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Dowd who wrote (34285)11/18/1999 9:04:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
To All: Is the judge having second thoughts and leaving a little wiggle room for himself in that trying to force MSFT to confessing to be a witch has failed?

November 18, 1999 19:55

Judge to hear more oral arguments in Microsoft case
WASHINGTON, Nov 18 (Reuters) - The judge in the Microsoft case will hear oral arguments in February to help him decide whether the company violated the nation's antitrust law, lawyers involved in the case said after meeting with him Thursday.
District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson met privately met with representatives of Microsoft Corp. and 19 states and the federal government to lay plans for the next phase of the trial.

Earlier this month, Jackson found the facts of the case are that Microsoft used monopoly power to harm consumers and competitors. Based on those facts, Jackson will next decide whether Microsoft's actions violated the law and what remedies may be appropriate.

Jackson had already set the dates for written briefs. On Thursday, he limited the size of the briefs and said he would allow the oral arguments.

The government's brief, due Dec. 6, and that of Microsoft, due January 17, are each limited to 70 pages. The government's reply brief, due Jan. 24, and that of Microsoft, due Jan. 31, are each limited to 30 pages. Oral arguments will follow in February.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext