gao: This will do it. The key point to my knowing the system is working..
You see this woman gave the company big proof and even gave it to the right people IMOl....
Think of what was said... The system worked it just was not clear and pointed on the picture.. If she touched up something why was it there in the first place. If it did not work would she talk about touching up nothing? Think about it...
Here is the clip:::
((Diane Strait, who joined IDS as a technical writer and graphic designer in late 1996, said
Grable declared breast images taken during clinical testing as unfit for use at RSNA. In a
statement given to the FDA, Strait said Grable told her to modify the images with a
computer graphics program called PhotoShop. On one image, she darkened two cysts. On
another, she brightened an area of cancer and moved it elsewhere on the breast.
''The altered images were posted at the IDSI booth at the RSNA meeting,'' Strait said in
her FDA affidavit. ''None were identified with the statement, 'images enhanced.' ''
When she learned that the company planned to send the images to the FDA, Strait said
she objected, saying she didn't want to take part in a fraud. The following Monday, she
said she was fired.
Grable wouldn't talk about Strait, her allegations or why she was fired.
''She made a statement filled with half-truths, and I'm not going to say what was true or
untrue,'' he snapped. ''I will not get down in the dirt with a disgruntled employee who was
fired.''}}}
Have fun and do your DD..
Regards,
Jim...
|
