<<<if Mr. Bush has beliefs (to which he is entitled) that question
homosexual behavior as morally wrong, then it is perfectly logical
that he may feel that he would not "knowingly" appoint a
homosexual to office >>>
Oh, I agree with you-- though I think the comparison to gambling is a faulty one.
In some forum, somewhere, I may "criticize" the position, since I am critical of it. However, here, I don't believe I did that. I merely pointed out what you and I evidently agree on: that Bush has said he would not knowingly appoint a homosexual to office.
Bill and JLA, however, deny that this is his position. So the discussion never got as far as a critique of the position. Why critique a position it is denied he has, after all!
It is pleasant to have had an ally as regarding what Bush was reported by the Christian conservatives as having given as his position, on this thread, though! |
