SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: If only I'd held who wrote (15351)11/19/1999 6:52:00 PM
From: HeatherN  Read Replies (1) of 57584
 
If by health care stocks you mean drug stocks, these do show some upside. The AHP/Warner Lambert/Pfizer triangle tussle shows how important it is for these companies to "fill the gaps" in their own companies. Pfizer needs R&D for their powerhouse marketing and sales force. AHP, having settled the Redux problem is now a more attractive suitor. AHP would like WL's R&D/biotech resources. Now, only Merck seems to have a complete package. I spoke with one of their VPs yesterday who reassured us that he was not aware of any merger talks "It's not our style". Anyway, drug stocks, despite recent improvements probably have some upside.

If by health care you mean HMO, management, hospital, physician practice, I would stay away, away. Too many budget cuts, declining reimbursements and a heavy government hand in things. Not a good combo.
Then there's what I think of as technohealth...Medtronic, Arthrocare etc. So far, insurance companies have been more willing to pay for devices rather than services. The physician and hospital reimbursement for a joint replacement has declined but the cost of the titanium joint has not.
Just a few thoughts from an insider....

HeatherN
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext