SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (9279)11/20/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: E  Read Replies (3) of 769670
 
<<<Actually, I am mistaken, I do not think I formulated a question, but mentioned that I
could not recall an instance of Bush knowingly appointing a gay ambassador, and
was quizzical when you responded with an instance that you knew of, but would not
identify, implying that the person was not commonly known to be gay. I am sorry that I
mischaracterized that portion of the exchange, confusing it with your refusal to answer
the more explicit queries of others..... >>>

Are you implying you suspect I lied about knowing the gay ambassador because I think it best not to post his name? JLA understood why I might want to respect his privacy, and I assumed you did, too.

Please identify your "quizzical" post on this subject, the one in which you expressed by implication your doubt. I would have followed up had I noticed this.

All you have to do, Neo, is to tell me that you doubt the truth of my statement, and I will identify him to you by PM, and explain how I come to know him and many of his associates and friends, and include a link to his CV. You will merely have to undertake to protect both his identity and the personal information I will need to give you about myself.

Would you list the queries of others I have failed to respond to, please? I wrote 23 posts on this thread yesterday, being the only one trying to reply to many posters. In fact, I have fallen so far behind that I must work all weekend, and had so hoped to be finished here! But still, if you will do that for me, supplying links to the posts containing what you consider the important questions that my 23 posts failed to answer, I will do my best to answer them, and also go to the trouble of posting to you all the questions I waited vainly for an answer to. I would love answers to them from you, JLA, and Bill Vaughn, in particular.

BTW, are you the poster who yesterday said that none of you disliked homosexuals "per se"? I would be pleased to supply examples of statements that would seem to contradict that assertion, if you wish to see them. I'll start with a search for the word "abomination," but won't stop there.

There are SO many questions I wanted answered! Will you be the liaison in seeing that all questions posed receive answers, even though none you posed to me failed to? It would be a great favor to me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext